close
1.

図書

図書
研究代表者 藤村正司
出版情報: [新潟] : [藤村正司], 2003.3
シリーズ名: 科学研究費補助金基盤研究(C)(2)研究成果報告書 ; 平成12年度〜平成14年度
所蔵情報: loading…
2.

図書

図書
研究代表者 藤村正司
出版情報: [新潟] : [藤村正司], 2000.3
シリーズ名: 科学研究費補助金(基盤研究C)研究成果報告書 ; 平成10年度-平成11年度
所蔵情報: loading…
3.

図書

図書
加野芳正, 藤村正司, 浦田広朗編著
出版情報: 町田 : 玉川大学出版部, 2007.10
シリーズ名: 玉川大学教職専門シリーズ
所蔵情報: loading…
4.

図書

図書
高橋桂子 [ほか著]
出版情報: 新潟 : 新潟大学教育人間科学部, 2007.3
所蔵情報: loading…
5.

図書

図書
藤村正司, 寺崎里水執筆 ; 広島大学高等教育研究開発センター編
出版情報: 東広島 : 広島大学高等教育研究開発センター, 2003.3
シリーズ名: 高等教育研究叢書 / 広島大学大学教育研究センター [編] ; 73
所蔵情報: loading…
6.

論文(リポジトリ)

論文(リポジトリ)
加野, 芳正 ; 陣内, 靖彦 ; 久冨, 善之 ; 酒井, 朗 ; 潮木, 守一 ; 耳塚, 寛明 ; 藤村, 正司
出版情報: 教育社会学研究 — 教育社会学研究.  78  pp.366-368,  2006-05.  日本教育社会学会
本文リンク: http://hdl.handle.net/10191/18253
7.

論文(リポジトリ)

論文(リポジトリ)
藤村, 正司
出版情報: 大学教育研究年報 — 大学教育研究年報.  9  pp.65-77,  2004-03.  新潟大学大学教育開発研究センター
本文リンク: http://hdl.handle.net/10191/2374
概要: In 1991 the Standard for the Establishing a University were revised to abolish the distinction between general and specialized education in response to a report of the University Council. Since then, universities have been struggled with how to organize general education system. But, general education is not achieved only through the formal curriculum reform, but through reading behavior of students. The purpose of this survey is to investigate the relationship between the reading behavior and reference groups of the period of graduate's attendance at Niigata University. Surveys are designed to mirror the reading behavior of their schooldays and that of now. Main finding is that the reason why young generation does not read books depends on a matter of individual taste of their generation, but at the same time reference group to read books among them died out of itself. So university teachers should not only guide reading book list, but also organize reference groups to cultivate the habit and method to read. 続きを見る
8.

論文(リポジトリ)

論文(リポジトリ)
藤村, 正司
出版情報: 大学教育研究年報 — 大学教育研究年報.  8  pp.139-145,  2003-03.  新潟大学大学教育開発研究センター
本文リンク: http://hdl.handle.net/10191/2361
概要: This survey had two purposes. The first purpose is to draw the Box-plot distributions of GP (grade point) of first year course in Niigata University. The second purpose is to investigate the relationship between the GP distribution and the evaluation methods of professors who are charge of first year course. The followings are major findings, 1) The distribution of GP is so wide among and between the groupings of courses. Especially, there are some outliers in the upper end of distribution in grade A. So, standards of the evaluation should be made clear from the point view of fairness. 2) The grade points depend on the method of evaluation, class size, the characteristics of employment of the professors, to say nothing of the type of courses. Small class and the method of class participation tend to obtain gratifying results. But it is wonder that an assignment of report cannot anticipate the GP distribution. This may mean that because evaluation of student's report relies on the professor's intuition, it is difficult to grade objectively. 続きを見る
9.

論文(リポジトリ)

論文(リポジトリ)
藤村, 正司
出版情報: 大学教育研究年報 — 大学教育研究年報.  7  pp.45-57,  2002-03.  新潟大学大学教育開発研究センター
本文リンク: http://hdl.handle.net/10191/2496
概要: The purpose of this survey is to investigate the relationship between the actual condition of the student's completion at high school credits and the understanding of first year course in Niigata University. Surveys are designed to mirror the consciousness of students who are affiliated to Faculty of Education and Human Sciences and that of professors who are charge of first year course. The followings are major findings, 1) The number of students who took the credits of natural sciences and social studies at high school is extremely low. 2) Students spend few hours for preparing and reviewing classes. The more they prepare and review classes, the higher scores they get. Students who showed their high ability on English at high school got higher scores on foreign languages courses. 3) As the measure to improve the understanding by students, both professors and students pointed out teaching method. In addition to teaching method, Professors on natural sciences agree with the introduction of remedial education, but professors on social sciences disagree with it. 4) Almost all the students agree to indicate the standard for evaluation. For the introduction of strict evaluation such as GPA, standards for evaluation should be made clear. 続きを見る